第一篇：一个环保者的力量
环保志愿者（一个人的力量）
一、杰桑·索南达杰原青海治多县西部工委书记以生命保护藏羚羊
二、梁从诫原全国政协常委、历史学家创办自然之友，引爆民间环保
三、廖晓义原中国社科院哲学所助理研究员从传统文化挖掘中式环保模式
四、霍岱珊原河南周口日报摄影记者多次考察淮河，成为淮河卫士
五、马军原外企员工开放污染地图，倒逼污染企业
六、梅念蜀原环境公司员工促进《昆明地下水保护条例》出台
七、程景北京百子湾小区居民检测电磁环境，破解邻居疑虑
八、韦东英浙江萧山普通农民撰写抗污日记，举报钱塘江污染
九、宋军九汉天成公司董事长在环境贫困地区发展生态产业
十、刘晓光首创集团总经理跪地一哭，引来一百位企业家参与环境保护
一个人的力量，环保志愿者的力量
渺小者，会在艰难之间，变得伟大。
当你感觉无力的时候，你已经有了力量。因为，你觉得环境与你有关。
当你想付出的时候，你已经能够超越，因为，你能做许多事。
1993年，可可西里采金和盗猎达到疯狂地步。青海治多县西部工委书记，索南达杰，有一天想，如果权力无法阻止藏羚羊被屠杀，那么即使权力挂腰全身，又有什么用处？于是，他把手中很小的权力，成了环境保护巨大的力量。
1994年1月8日，索南达杰在抓获盗猎分子的途中，为了救治受伤的盗猎分子，他被盗猎分子杀害。他的身体，在零下三十多度的气温下，永远保持着射击的姿式；他的身体，成为可可西里的环境保护神。
更多的环保志愿者跟上来了。
梁从诫，历史学家，因为不忍心看到中国环境恶化下去，1994年，他和三个朋友，一起创立了中国第一个民间环保组织“自然之友”。从此，缓慢地引爆了中国民间环保的能量。他们使用着一个共同的名字，他们叫，环保志愿者。
他们试图保护身边受伤害的每一个生灵。
（志愿者保护物种向杀戮者奋起反击的画面）
（北京山水吕植保护熊猫，奚志农保护滇金丝猴，温州绿眼睛保护青蛙等）
有一天，在中国社科院哲学所工作的廖晓义，读到一篇论文，论文说，生态文明在中国可能很难实现，生态恶化将不可阻挡。
廖晓义突然想，如果知识无法保护环境，那么知识又有什么用处？
她决心成为环保志愿者。
1996年，她创立了北京地球村环境教育中心，她想把城市所有的社区，都变成绿色社
区；她想从中国传统文化中汲取力量，阻止环境恶化。
霍岱珊，河南周口日报摄影记者，1997年，他孤身考察淮河，从此成了“淮河卫士”，把淮河饱受摧残的真相，告诉给公众。
中国最好的环保作家唐锡阳、徐刚、沈孝辉、郭耕，也是这样的，他们用尽自己的心血，去写中国冲突最剧烈的文字，让人们看到了中国生态的现实，激励人们奋起拯救身边的环境。
（四五个民间环保人士）
1998年开始，北京九汉天成公司董事长宋军，想在西北干旱地区，探索出一条生态产业化道路，他建起了月亮湖沙漠度假区。
2004年，著名房地产公司首创集团的董事长刘晓光，跪在阿拉善月亮湖边的沙地上，放声大哭。
他发现，当很多人一门心思拼命挣钱的时候，我们的环境已经恶化到了不可收拾的地步。他想，如果环境全面恶化了，水全部弄脏了，树全部砍光了，沙子盖满城市，即使人人都拥有一座金山，又有什么用处？
他从此成为环保志愿者，把积累财富所获得的力量，化为环境保护的力量。
2004年6月5日，王石、冯仑、宋军、张树新等100名中国优秀企业家，站在阿拉善月亮湖的忏悔墙边，发布了《阿拉善宣言》。
这些财富等身的人，从此都成了环保志愿者。他们创办的阿拉善SEE生态协会，成为中国环保志愿者的强大资助力量。他们所在的企业，都在成为环保型企业。
（不超过10名企业家）
在中国大地上，几乎每一个人，都具备“环保志愿者”的潜质。只要你愿意。
因为，如果环境恶化了，我们活着，又有什么意义？
因为，如果空气和水都活不下去了，我们又怎么可能活得下去？
2005年，因为创作《中国水危机》而名满天下的马军，从一家外企辞职，正式成为了环保志愿者。他带领公众环境研究中心，决心把中国的污染现状，做到一张电子地图上，让所有的人都可以见到。
2007年，梅念蜀正式从环保志愿者，成了“民间环保人士”，她带领昆明的志愿者们，对滇池周边地下水污染情况进行了调查，直接促成了《昆明地下水保护条例》的出台。
2003年底，因为无法再忍受钱塘江被一天天污染，无法忍受村里的环境日益恶化，浙江萧山的农妇韦东英，以只有小学五年级的文化，每天坚持写“抗污日记”，坚持拍摄村里的污染企业排放的污水，坚持向监管部门举报，成了钱塘江边，最受尊重的人。
2009年的正月初一，北京百子湾小区的普通居民程景，在小区BBS上贴出公告，告诉邻居们，经过他自费长达数月的检测，小区的电磁环境并不像大家担忧的那么糟糕。受他的影响，一个名叫达尔问自然求知社的环保科普组织出现了，他们的目标，就是帮助公众发现身边环境真相。
因此，你不是什么都做不了，你什么都能做。
只要你尊重环境，一切就有可能。
每一个人的力量，都可以成为环保志愿者的力量。
如果你愿意，请把你的手，放在上面。
第二篇：一个送信者
一个送信者
—《把信送给加西亚》读后感
若给你一个送信的机会，你会成功把信送给加西亚吗？你会是安德鲁·萨默斯.罗文？
《把信送给加西亚》讲述了一个简单的故事。19世纪美西战争中,美方有一封具有战略意义的书信,急需送到古巴盟军将领加西亚的手中,可是加西亚正在丛林作战,没人知道他在什么地方。安德鲁·萨默斯.罗文此接受美国总统麦金莱的命令，历尽种种磨难，把那封信交给了加西亚，为最终美国取得战争的胜利做出了巨大贡献。
故事虽然精短，却蕴含了令人深思的道理。作为送信者，罗文身上体现出的不仅仅是忠诚，勇敢，还有积极主动的执行力，这些也正是我们现在工作中所需要学习的品质。
作为世界产销书籍之一，《把信送给加西亚》的受欢迎程度可见一斑，正如一千读者就有一千个哈姆雷特一样，每个人对送信者都有自己的感悟。读过这个故事，让我对工作中的执行力有了更加深刻的反思。工作中最大的敌人就是惰性，对于领导布置的任务，拖三拉四，不去积极完成，这样对于自己打成长没有一点好处，而且也不会给同事留下好的印象。
上级布置的工作，就是一封信，你会成功送到吗？你会立即去执行吗？不会因为任务困难而推诿吗？不可否认，有时候对于比较麻烦的工作，自己面对的时候不免会抱怨，不免会推脱，结果拖到最后还是要去做，还是要去完成，而且由于前期的准备不足，最终的效果非常不好，还也会耽误一些其他事情。自己在这样的过程中得不偿失，也可以说是浪费了宝贵的时间，降级了工作效率。若是积极面对，在任务下达的时候立刻去执行，不畏艰辛，勇敢面对，尽管困难重重，但是我相信最后一定是硕果累累。千万不要推脱，不要往后推延，因为这样的你是在耽误你的青春，推脱你的生命。困难必然是有的，有困难就想办法去解决，没有趟不过的河，没有爬不过的山，不会游泳的话，不是还有船的吗？工作中有难题的话，可以请教同事，咨询权威，都可以有相对满意的结果的。怕的就是你不去做，没有在第一时间迈出你的脚步，耽误了行程。若寄予远方，就扬帆远航。不要找各种借口去推迟，因为这一刻不去做，或许就错过了绝佳的机会，或许以后就没有如此的契机了。积极面对，勇敢去做，立刻排上日程，主动去解决出现的问题，坚持到底，这样的执行力才是自己应该去学习，去领悟的。
若给我一个送信的机会，我会坚定的说：我会成功把信送到。
第三篇：内向者的力量[TED]
TED 演讲稿
Susan Cain : The Power of Introverts
When I was nine years old I went off to summer camp for the first time.And my mother packed me a suitcase full of books, which to me seemed like a perfectly natural thing to do.Because in my family, reading was the primary group activity.And this might sound antisocial to you, but for us it was really just a different way of being social.You have the animal warmth of your family sitting right next to you, but you are also free to go roaming around the adventureland inside your own mind.And I had this idea that camp was going to be just like this, but better.(Laughter)I had a vision of 10 girls sitting in a cabin cozily reading books in their matching nightgowns.(Laughter)
Camp was more like a keg party without any alcohol.And on the very first day our counselor gathered us all together and she taught us a cheer that she said we would be doing every day for the rest of the summer to instill camp spirit.And it went like this: “R-O-W-D-I-E, that's the way we spell rowdie.Rowdie, rowdie, let's get rowdie.” Yeah.So I couldn't figure out for the life of me why we were supposed to be so rowdy, or why we had to spell this word incorrectly.(Laughter)But I recited a cheer.I recited a cheer along with everybody else.I did my best.And I just waited for the time that I could go off and read my books.But the first time that I took my book out of my suitcase, the coolest girl in the bunk came up to me and she asked me, “Why are you being so mellow?”--mellow, of course, being the exact opposite of R-O-W-D-I-E.And then the second time I tried it, the counselor came up to me with a concerned expression on her face and she repeated the point about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing.And so I put my books away, back in their suitcase, and I put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer.And I felt kind of guilty about this.I felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they were calling out to me and I was forsaking them.But I did forsake them and I didn't open that suitcase again until I was back home with my family at the end of the summer.Now, I tell you this story about summer camp.I could have told you 50 others just like it--all the times that I got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that I should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert.And I always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were.But for years I denied this intuition, and so I became a Wall Street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that I had always longed to be--partly because I needed to prove to myself that I could be bold and assertive too.And I was always going off to crowded bars when I really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends.And I made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that I wasn't even aware that I was making them.TED 演讲稿
Now this is what many introverts do, and it's our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues' loss and our communities' loss.And at the risk of sounding grandiose, it is the world's loss.Because when it comes to creativity and to leadership, we need introverts doing what they do best.A third to a half of the population are introverts--a third to a half.So that's one out of every two or three people you know.So even if you're an extrovert yourself, I'm talking about your coworkers and your spouses and your children and the person sitting next to you right now--all of them subject to this bias that is pretty deep and real in our society.We all internalize it from a very early age without even having a language for what we're doing.Now to see the bias clearly you need to understand what introversion is.It's different from being shy.Shyness is about fear of social judgment.Introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation.So extroverts really crave large amounts of stimulation, whereas introverts feel at their most alive and their most switched-on and their most capable when they're in quieter, more low-key environments.Not all the time--these things aren't absolute--but a lot of the time.So the key then to maximizing our talents is for us all to put ourselves in the zone of stimulation that is right for us.But now here's where the bias comes in.Our most important institutions, our schools and our workplaces, they are designed mostly for extroverts and for extroverts' need for lots of stimulation.And also we have this belief system right now that I call the new groupthink, which holds that all creativity and all productivity comes from a very oddly gregarious place.So if you picture the typical classroom nowadays: When I was going to school, we sat in rows.We sat in rows of desks like this, and we did most of our work pretty autonomously.But nowadays, your typical classroom has pods of desks--four or five or six or seven kids all facing each other.And kids are working in countless group assignments.Even in subjects like math and creative writing, which you think would depend on solo flights of thought;kids are now expected to act as committee members.And for the kids who prefer to go off by themselves or just to work alone, those kids are seen as outliers often or, worse, as problem cases.And the vast majority of teachers reports believing that the ideal student is an extrovert as opposed to an introvert, even though introverts actually get better grades and are more knowledgeable, according to research.(Laughter)
Okay, same thing is true in our workplaces.Now, most of us work in open plan offices,without walls, where we are subject to the constant noise and gaze of our coworkers.And when it comes to leadership, introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions,even though introverts tend to be very careful, much less likely to take outsize risks--which is something we might all favor nowadays.And interesting research by Adam Grant at the Wharton School has found that introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes than extroverts do, because when they are managing proactive employees, they're much more likely to let those employees run with their ideas, whereas an extrovert can, quite unwittingly, get so excited about things that they're putting their own stamp on things, and other people's ideas might not as easily then bubble up to the surface.TED 演讲稿
Now in fact, some of our transformative leaders in history have been introverts.I'll give you some examples.Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosa Parks, Gandhi--all these peopled described themselves as quiet and soft-spoken and even shy.And they all took the spotlight, even though every bone in their bodies was telling them not to.And this turns out to have a special power all its own, because people could feel that these leaders were at the helm,not because they enjoyed directing others and not out of the pleasure of being looked at;they were there because they had no choice, because they were driven to do what they thought was right.Now I think at this point it's important for me to say that I actually love extroverts.I always like to say some of my best friends are extroverts, including my beloved husband.And we all fall at different points, of course, along the introvert/extrovert spectrum.Even Carl Jung, the psychologist who first popularized these terms, said that there's no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert.He said that such a man would be in a lunatic asylum, if he existed at all.And some people fall smack in the middle of the introvert/extrovert spectrum,and we call these people ambiverts.And I often think that they have the best of all worlds.But many of us do recognize ourselves as one type or the other.And what I'm saying is that culturally we need a much better balance.We need more of a yin and yang between these two types.This is especially important when it comes to creativity and to productivity, because when psychologists look at the lives of the most creative people, what they find are people who are very good at exchanging ideas and advancing ideas, but who also have a serious streak of introversion in them.And this is because solitude is a crucial ingredient often to creativity.So Darwin, he took long walks alone in the woods and emphatically turned down dinner party invitations.Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr.Seuss, he dreamed up many of his amazing creationsin a lonely bell tower office that he had in the back of his house in La Jolla, California.And he was actually afraid to meet the young children who read his books for fear that they were expecting him this kind of jolly Santa Claus-like figure and would be disappointed with his more reserved persona.Steve Wozniak invented the first Apple computer sitting alone in his cubical in Hewlett-Packard where he was working at the time.And he says that he never would have become such an expert in the first place had he not been too introverted to leave the house when he was growing up.Now of course, this does not mean that we should all stop collaborating--and case in point, is Steve Wozniak famously coming together with Steve Jobs to start Apple Computer--but it does mean that solitude matters and that for some people it is the air that they breathe.And in fact, we have known for centuries about the transcendent power of solitude.It's only recently that we've strangely begun to forget it.If you look at most of the world's major religions, you will find seekers--Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad--seekers who are going off by themselves alone to the wilderness where they then have profound epiphanies and revelations that they then bring back to the rest of the community.So no wilderness, no revelations.TED 演讲稿
This is no surprise though if you look at the insights of contemporary psychology.It turns out that we can't even be in a group of people without instinctively mirroring, mimicking their opinions.Even about seemingly personal and visceral things like who you're attracted to,you will start aping the beliefs of the people around you without even realizing that that's what you're doing.And groups famously follow the opinions of the most dominant or charismatic person in the room, even though there's zero correlation between being the best talker and having the best ideas--I mean zero.So...(Laughter)You might be following the person with the best ideas, but you might not.And do you really want to leave it up to chance? Much better for everybody to go off by themselves, generate their own ideas freed from the distortions of group dynamics, and then come together as a team to talk them through in a well-managed environment and take it from there.Now if all this is true, then why are we getting it so wrong? Why are we setting up our schools this way and our workplaces? And why are we making these introverts feel so guiltyabout wanting to just go off by themselves some of the time? One answer lies deep in our cultural history.Western societies, and in particular the U.S., have always favored the man of action over the man of contemplation and “man” of contemplation.But in America's early days, we lived in what historians call a culture of character, where we still, at that point, valued people for their inner selves and their moral rectitude.And if you look at the self-help books from this era, they all had titles with things like “Character, the Grandest Thing in the World.” And they featured role models like Abraham Lincoln who was praised for being modest and unassuming.Ralph Waldo Emerson called him “A man who does not offend by superiority.” But then we hit the 20th century and we entered a new culture that historians call the culture of personality.What happened is we had evolved an agricultural economy to a world of big business.And so suddenly people are moving from small towns to the cities.And instead of working alongside people they've known all their lives, now they are having to prove themselves in a crowd of strangers.So, quite understandably, qualities like magnetism and charisma suddenly come to seem really important.And sure enough, the self-help books change to meet these new needs and they start to have names like “How to Win Friends and Influence People.” And they feature as their role models really great salesmen.So that's the world we're living in today.That's our cultural inheritance.Now none of this is to say that social skills are unimportant, and I'm also not calling for the abolishing of teamwork at all.The same religions who send their sages off to lonely mountain tops also teach us love and trust.And the problems that we are facing today in fields like science and in economics are so vast and so complex that we are going to need armies of people coming together to solve them working together.But I am saying that the more freedom that we give introverts to be themselves, the more likely that they are to come up with their own unique solutions to these problems.So now I'd like to share with you what's in my suitcase today.Guess what? Books.I have a suitcase full of books.Here's Margaret Atwood, “Cat's Eye.” Here's a novel by Milan Kundera.And here's “The Guide for the Perplexed” by Maimonides.But these are not exactly
TED 演讲稿
my books.I brought these books with me because they were written by my grandfather's favorite authors.My grandfather was a rabbi and he was a widower who lived alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn that was my favorite place in the world when I was growing up, partly because it was filled with his very gentle, very courtly presence and partly because it was filled with books.I mean literally every table, every chair in this apartment had yielded its original function to now serve as a surface for swaying stacks of books.Just like the rest of my family, my grandfather's favorite thing to do in the whole world was to read.But he also loved his congregation, and you could feel this love in the sermons that he gaveevery week for the 62 years that he was a rabbi.He would takes the fruits of each week's reading and he would weave these intricate tapestries of ancient and humanist thought.And people would come from all over to hear him speak.But here's the thing about my grandfather.Underneath this ceremonial role, he was really modest and really introverted--so much so that when he delivered these sermons, he had trouble making eye contact with the very same congregation that he had been speaking to for 62 years.And even away from the podium, when you called him to say hello, he would often end the conversation prematurely for fear that he was taking up too much of your time.But when he died at the age of 94, the police had to close down the streets of his neighborhood to accommodate the crowd of people who came out to mourn him.And so these days I try to learn from my grandfather's example in my own way.So I just published a book about introversion, and it took me about seven years to write.And for me, that seven years was like total bliss, because I was reading, I was writing, I was thinking, I was researching.It was my version of my grandfather's hours of the day alone in his library.But now all of a sudden my job is very different, and my job is to be out here talking about it, talking about introversion.(Laughter)And that's a lot harder for me, because as honored as I am to be here with all of you right now, this is not my natural milieu.So I prepared for moments like these as best I could.I spent the last year practicing public speaking every chance I could get.And I call this my “year of speaking dangerously.”(Laughter)And that actually helped a lot.But I'll tell you, what helps even more is my sense, my belief, my hope that when it comes to our attitudes to introversion and to quiet and to solitude, we truly are poised on the brink on dramatic change.I mean, we are.And so I am going to leave you now with three calls for action for those who share this vision.Number one: Stop the madness for constant group work.Just stop it.(Laughter)Thank you.(Applause)And I want to be clear about what I'm saying, because I deeply believe our offices should be encouraging casual, chatty cafe-style types of interactions--you know, the kind where people come together and serendipitously have an exchange of ideas.That is great.It's great for introverts and it's great for extroverts.But we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work.School, same thing.We need to be
TED 演讲稿
teaching kids to work together, for sure, but we also need to be teaching them how to work on their own.This is especially important for extroverted children too.They need to work on their own because that is where deep thought comes from in part.Okay, number two: Go to the wilderness.Be like Buddha, have your own revelations.I'm not saying that we all have to now go off and build our own cabins in the woods and never talk to each other again, but I am saying that we could all stand to unplug and get inside our own heads a little more often.Number three: Take a good look at what's inside your own suitcase and why you put it there.So extroverts, maybe your suitcases are also full of books.Or maybe they're full of champagne glasses or skyping equipment.Whatever it is, I hope you take these things out every chance you get and grace us with your energy and your joy.But introverts, you being you, you probably have the impulse to guard very carefully what's inside your own suitcase.And that's okay.But occasionally, just occasionally, I hope you will open up your suitcases for other people to see, because the world needs you and it needs the things you carry.So I wish you the best of all possible journeys and the courage to speak softly.Thank you very much.(Applause)Thank you.Thank you.(Applause)
第四篇：一个卑劣者的反抗
一个卑劣者的反抗
——《红楼梦》中的赵姨娘
摘要赵姨娘在《红楼梦》中被塑造为一个卑劣的、人格扭曲的“万人嫌”。本文通过分析其尴尬的地位，低俗的言语，愚蠢的行为，探讨其病态的悲剧人生。深入剖析其奋起反抗，采取小人战术，无所不用其极的报复手段，暗斗明争，却屡战屡败的斗争始末。揭露其“不成功亦不成仁”的实质。关键词赵姨娘 阴微鄙贱 抗争 悲剧 封建制度
《红楼梦》为世人上演了一部封建贵族的家族史，着墨最多之处莫过于那些太太小姐，侍妾婢女，群芳之中自有才情显赫的佳人，亦不乏阴微下贱的鄙俗之人，赵姨娘正是后者首当其冲的代表。
赵姨娘是荣国府贾政的妾，探春与贾环的生母，生性糊涂，心术不正，被家人看不起，尤其常被亲生女儿奚落，说她的想法不过是阴微鄙贱的见识。按理，赵姨娘在贾府里像熬油似的熬了大半辈子，又为贾府生儿育女，虽比不上焦大在战场上出生入死为主人卖命，其地位要比那些大丫头、管家婆子高，至少不应受到歧视，但其实不然，常遭下人讥讽。贾府的当权者更是视之如草芥，对她没有好声气，好脸色。赵姨娘于是便处于一个主不主，奴不奴的尴尬境地，你说她是主子，她知道自己不是主子，会认为你拿她开涮；你说她是丫鬟，她当然知道自己不是丫鬟，会认为你太小看她了，毕竟，她对贾府有延续香火之功。就地位而言，赵姨娘如此，而就财产而言，又明显低于众人，在月例银子的分配上, 邢夫人、王夫人是二十两;凤姐、李纨是十两, 李纨因有贾兰, 又添了十两;迎春、探春等是二两,又有头油脂粉钱二两;而赵姨娘只有二两, 加上贾环的二两也只有四两, 与王夫人等差之甚远，甚至不及鸳鸯、平儿、袭人等有头脸的丫鬟（第三十六回）。甚至连一块成样的鞋面子都没有（第二十五回）。在第二十回，贾环与莺儿等玩耍输了钱负气而回，赵姨娘啐他：“谁让你上高台盘子？下流没脸的东西！那里玩不得？谁让你跑了去讨没意思！”可巧凤姐在窗外过，听在耳内，便隔窗说到：“大正月又怎么了？环兄弟小孩子家，一半点儿错了，你只教导他，说这些谈话作什么！凭他怎么去，还有太太老爷管他呢，就大口啐他！他现是主子，不好了，横竖有教导他的人，与你什么相干！”
王熙凤的这番以主子身份辱骂赵姨娘遵循的正是礼教这一准则，所以赵姨娘对此不敢则声。正是封建宗法等级制度和家长专制制度造成了赵姨娘身微言轻，丧失尊严，丧失话语权，也正是由于这些制度，赵姨娘越来越不甘心自己下贱的现状，本该高人一等，却偏偏屈居人下，心理上渐趋变形扭曲，行为也越发畸形，愚蛮粗野，猥琐贪婪，自私恶妒。身份卑微之人，在失利后，总是恨不得向宿敌谄媚讨好，如宝钗送了贾环些东西，忙到王夫人前卖好儿，谁知却碰了一鼻子灰，乘兴而来败兴而归；见到平儿忙赔笑让坐，并问候凤姐，即使是在盛怒之下也如此。凡此种种，都淋漓尽致的显现出其奴颜婢膝的卑劣性格。
凡失落者，总是不甘心于不上不下的局面，总要挣扎出不三不四的处境。赵姨娘很明确自己的妾身地位和凄惨处境，更知道“庶子只有在没有嫡子的情况下，才能继承父祖的爵位”，于是王熙凤，这位贾府的财政掌权者，贾宝玉，这位荣国府的第一顺位继承人就理所当然的成为赵姨娘的两大劲敌，视其为眼中钉肉中刺。哪里有压迫，哪里就有反抗，压迫越深重，反抗就越强烈。所谓不在沉默中爆发，就在沉默中死亡，压力山大的赵姨娘只有两条路可走，要么安分如周姨娘、尤二姐，屈从并满足于所处地位，隐忍妥协，逆来顺受，退让不争，委曲求全，所有的苦往肚子里咽；要么铤而走险，索性举起反抗的大旗，无所不用其极，去维护和争取自身的权益。赵姨娘选择了后者，以反抗者的姿态呈现给世人。
赵姨娘的首次抗争表现在第二十五回“魇魔法姊弟逢五鬼”中，赵姨娘的点滴的怨恨和不满在马道婆的蛊惑下，企图用“魇魔法”置贾宝玉和凤姐于死地，在听闻马道婆有法子除去此二人时，遂将攒的几两梯己、衣服、簪子都赠与马道婆，还写下五百两高额欠契，并语出“你若果然法子灵验，把他两个绝了，明日这家私不怕不是我环儿的。那时你要什么不得？”可见除二人之心甚为强烈。但此次斗争是基于不堪被人奚落、蔑视，采取的报复手段，而报复正是诉求与阴暗的捣鬼手段，从阴险毒辣处下手，往死里整，残忍，野蛮，甚至是失却人性的，如果说赵姨娘是革命者，也只是一个“下流的革命者”，选择在适当时机孤注一掷，关键时刻铤而走险。在宝玉奄奄一息的紧要关头，却生生将自己推送到风口浪尖上，上前安慰劝说贾母，反遭贾母在众目睽睽之下毫不留情的痛骂，真是自取其辱，愚昧不堪。
一次的失败并未使赵姨娘安分，反而掀起二次抗争。第五十五回写到，赵姨娘的兄弟赵国基死了，临时代理家政的探春按理发放丧葬费20两，赵姨娘颇为不满，跑来与探春评理争辩，开口便道：“这屋里的人都踩下我的头去还罢了，姑娘你也想一想，该替我出气才是。”“姑娘现踩我，我告诉谁！”认为自己的亲兄弟、女儿的亲舅舅的地位竟不如丫头袭人，亲生女儿不给她面子。不想，此次大闹非但没有争得自己应享的权利，反被探春驳得灰头土脸，颜面无存。“太太疼你，你越发拉扯拉扯我们。你只顾讨太太的疼，就把我们忘了。”赵姨娘这句话无疑是希望探春能够帮自己在尊严上和经济上做维护，渴望在女儿掌权的过程中自己的命运能有一个明显的转机，但探春却以主子拉扯奴才之话训斥她，赵姨娘气急道出探春“如今没有长羽毛，就忘了根本”，“只顾自己拣高枝儿飞”，不认亲娘不认舅，这些话更戳到探春的痛处，这位庶出的小姐为了有尊严的活着，一直在不断努力，赵姨娘却每每生事，如此的的公开刁难让探春委屈痛苦，恨不得与这不争气的娘一刀两断，故而说出那番绝情之话。赵姨娘的二次抗争又在失败中落幕，亲生女站在主子的地位否定她，令她更加灰头土脸，没落失意，境地更加尴尬。
接二连三的失败使赵姨娘的身心备受打击，精神上千疮百孔，越发失态，闹出第三次革命。第六十回贾环向芳官索要蔷薇硝，芳官在无奈之下以茉莉粉代替蔷薇硝来应对和敷衍他，赵姨娘知晓后便不依不饶，上演了一出大闹怡红院的戏码。不顾彩云的好心劝阻，一意孤行，挑唆儿子反抗不成，于是亲自前往教训那些个“猫儿狗儿”，且受到夏婆子的煽风点火，越发不知轻重，与芳官等一行小丫头大打出手，厮打的不可开交，没有半点主子形象，丢尽了颜面，落了个狼狈不堪，最后又遭到探春的怒斥，毫无半点尊严，只得闭口无言，尴尬回房。赵姨娘的这次无理取闹，实是被逼到绝地了，全不顾身家性命，不自尊不自重，一味做垂死挣扎。
赵姨娘一路反抗，结果却是一次次的失败，虽然是无畏的抗争，但她的行为却不能一语否决。王昆仑先生这样评价赵姨娘：“被压在绝望的深坑底下的动物，她会在阴暗中猛然给人以致命的狠咬一口，只有处在最卑弱的最苦难的地位才会想突然飞到最高的地位上去，这种妄念也是完全合乎情理的。”
但赵姨娘的抗争实际是一出彻底的悲剧。看赵姨娘抗争的目的，由最初的与当权者争权夺利到争二十两银子再到和家下人争口恶气，所求越来越小，抗争行为却逐步升级，由暗里转向明里，做出不顾后果的举动，最后再无能力反抗。就赵姨娘个人而言，她头脑简单，虚弱而又不甘虚弱，做事盲目，沉不住气易被人利用；被人欺凌却更欺凌弱小；意图抗争却不懂谋略，低俗愚昧；四处树敌，大失人心，置自己为极不利的处境；看不清敌我力量的悬殊，一味蛮干，做殊死挣
扎，弄出贻笑大方的举止，搬起石头砸自己的脚，自取灭亡；抗争手段卑劣下贱，采取小人战术，难以让人苟同。每次的抗争都近乎闹剧，达不到最终目的，甚至连最起码的清醒也丧失了，沦为一个彻头彻尾的丑角。身心饱受摧残，生活也没有了斗志，心理的扭曲，最终导致其病态的悲剧。
此外，赵姨娘革命的失败，更是封建等级社会、宗法伦理制度的产物。根据封建婚姻制度的规定，妾与夫却是半主半奴的关系，与妻也不能平起平坐，地位只比奴婢略高。作为贾政的侍妾，宝玉的姨娘，赵姨娘实质上逃不出奴才等级的地位，力量之薄弱是肯定的，她屡次抗争不过是为了改变自己的奴才地位。在母凭子贵的社会，嫡庶之间的较量是不可避免的，赵姨娘费尽心思的抗争，无非不是为取得家族经济权和继承权，只有正妻的儿子不在了，庶子才能上台，只有获得了经济上的独立，才能拥有其他方面的支配权。赵姨娘意识到了封建妻妾制度带给自己的不平等，这种觉醒本是值得赞赏的，但是她并没有完全清醒到能够洞穿造成这种不平等的社会历史根源，即以男性利益为中心构建起来的封建等级森严的男权社会，仅凭一己之力反抗，是撼动不了这座腐朽的大厦半分的，仅仅是无奈的徒劳的挣扎，失败是必然的。赵姨娘的畸形心理、病态精神、丑陋行为，及其与探春的母女尴尬局面，也正是封建等级制度本身毁灭人性的反映。
赵姨娘，这个卑劣者的反抗，不成功亦不成仁，她的所作所为历来被人憎恶，是实至名归的可恶之人，但可恶之人必有其可怜之处，她只是一个被正统主义者的铁蹄践踏而死的牺牲者、反抗者，一个被礼教泯灭了人性的残弱女性，一个受害的坏人。
参考文献
[1]曹雪芹.红楼梦
[2]李国文.楼外谈红
[3]王颖卓.贾府里的“万人嫌”——论赵姨娘的形象.黑龙江社会科学.2001,5.[4]郭乙瑶.红楼里的疯女人——女性主义视域中的赵姨娘.贵州大学学报.2008,3.[5]石李锋.一个反抗者的遭遇——论赵姨娘的悲剧人生.新疆教育学院学报.2007，12.
第五篇：卑微者的力量读后感900字
卑微者的力量读后感900字
读完一本经典名著后，大家心中一定有不少感悟，记录下来很重要哦，一起来写一篇读后感吧。想必许多人都在为如何写好读后感而烦恼吧，下面是小编精心整理的卑微者的力量读后感900字，欢迎阅读与收藏。
卑微者的力量读后感900字1今天，我在家中观看了一部科幻惊悚片，名为《蝴蝶效应》。片中讲述了一个小男孩偶遇时光机，不断使用它改变自己人生中的错误，结果将世界弄得混沌一片的故事。由开始的惊喜，到之后的惊魂，故事起伏跌宕。
“蝴蝶效应”又称“混沌效应”，是美国麻省理工大学的洛克兹教授首次提出的。他用计算机编出了13个连续程序以测量大气，然后改变其中微小的一点，竟出现天翻地覆的变化。于是他打了一个比方：巴西的蝴蝶扇动几次翅膀，美国便可能产生强烈的龙转风，这就是“蝴蝶效应”，人们称它为“非线形运动”。
是的，卑微者的力量是不容忽视的。绳锯木木可断，水滴石石可穿。西方有一民谣：一只钉子掉了，一块马蹄铁脱了；一块马蹄铁脱了，一匹战马倒下了；一匹战马倒下了，一个骑士身亡了；一个骑士身亡了，一场战争失败了；一场战争失败了，一个帝国灭亡了！我们应该肯定卑微者、平庸者的力量。
千里之堤，溃于蚁穴。在古代，一名小吏天天在帽子中藏上一文钱，结果被一名大臣发现后就地处死。一天一文，千日千文，一文钱也许是微渺的，长期也会积少成多。看起来是一件小事，但是也会毁掉一个国家。有些人常常对浪费粮食等行为习以为常，不以为然，像电影中的主人公一样说：“只是一点点，根本就没有关系。”但中国十三亿人口，如果人人都浪费一点，一天就是几百亿甚至上万亿粒，即使有再多的财富和资源也会被挥霍一空。
古人常云：“一着不慎，满盘皆输。”“失之毫厘，差之千里。”一栋高楼，也许只是少了几根钢筋，但是后果却是灾难性的，楼房可能会倒塌，造成不可估量的人员伤亡。俄国1967年一次航天飞行，由于估算时少算了一位小数点，结果偏离了正确的降落地点而坠海，造成了机毁人亡的惨剧。三国之时，蜀国虎将关羽不愿与东吴联姻，蜀吴反目成仇，导致蜀国损兵折将，元气大伤，蜀国从此一蹶不振。
我们不能忽视卑微者的力量，他们一直支撑着这个世界，更不能忽视细节，它们将会把你一个周密的计划破坏。生活是非线形的，人可以改变命运，命运不是线形的，只因一点儿变化，离成功一步之近将化为万步之遥。愚公是卑微平庸的，但是他的力量也是不容忽视的，他的力量使大山消失，一个钉子亡了一个帝国，一句忠言也许就能改变你的命运。
看着街上耸立着的高楼大厦，那不是拔地而起的，而是建筑工人用双手日夜艰辛劳动的成果；看着街边清洁无尘，那都是清洁工们用扫帚打扫出来的。他们没有显赫的地位，他们都是与大多数人一样平凡，甚至可以说他们的地位十分的卑微，他们看似渺小，实是强大；他们看似卑微，实则伟大，他们的点滴力量就能完成一项项巨大的任务，他们的寸铁力量也许就能开辟美好的.未来！
卑微者的力量读后感900字2这件事情过去了，但每每想起的时候，总能给我一种历久弥新的震撼！
那是一天早晨上班的路上，当我穿过梧桐小区上坡路段时，一个熟悉而稚嫩的身影出现在我眼前，记得是前些日子我在埔厦路路摊吃早餐时所熟知的一张面孔，——那是一个三四岁的小男孩，一双乌黑的大眼睛，白净的皮肤，个头不算太胖。因为相逢过，所以去关注。
小男孩是出现在一辆收破烂的木板车后的，车上堆满了废旧胶件、纸皮、以及一些瓶罐，拉车的是一个蓬头垢面的中年妇女（她应该是小男孩的母亲），她瘦弱的身躯拉着一满车废品，又是在上坡路，脚步显得特别沉重吃力，而在木板车后，小男孩小心翼翼的搀扶木板车，不，应该是推着木板车奋力前行，他矮小的个头不及木板车高，但他依然使劲的推着，诚然，小男孩的力量是卑微的，但是，我能察觉到小男孩的面孔上表现出那种不卑不坑的坚毅。
我知道在这片热火朝天的土地上，有太多的人为了生计而奔波忙碌，他们任劳任怨，不怕脏不怕累，他们从事着这个城市最苦也最危险的活，他们是生活在这个城市最底层的劳动者。当我亲眼看到这样一幅场景的时候，我的心猛然颤抖，或许是对每一个弱小者的同情、或许是对每一个农民工的敬重，又或许是发自内心的关怀……一些莫名的感触涌上我的心头，就在这时，我猛然意识到小男孩的处境的危险，如果小男孩的母亲力不从心稍一松手，满载废品的木板车将直接压在小男孩身上，后果不堪设想。我加快脚步追过去，把小男孩拉到了木板车的侧边，并悄悄地帮他们把车推上了小区的平路，小男孩用不解的眼神望着我，良久，他们母子俩才消失在我的视野中。
生活中有许多卑微的人，就如同我遇到的这对不曾相识的母子。他们从不曾放弃生活，在人生的路上，他们相互搀扶，迎难而上，把万千卑微的力量凝聚在一起，化作了开天辟地的力量，也正是这样一些卑微的人，默默的为这个城市奉献着卑微的力量，集万千股卑微的力量推动着城市的滚滚巨轮，朝着更高、更远、更美的前方驶去！
鲁公网安备37028302000876号